N THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIACRIMINAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTIONCRIMINAL CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 10 OF 2009INI.A. NO. 1374, 1474, 2134 OF 2007INWRIT PETITION (c) NO. 202 OF 1995 IN THE MATTER OF: AMICUS CURIAE …PETITIONER VERSUS PRASHANT BHUSHAN & ANOTHER …RESPONDENTS AFFIDAVIT IN REPLY ON BEHALF OF RESPONDENT NO.1 I, Prashant Bhushan s/o Shri Shanti Bhushan, r/o B-16, Sector 14, Noida, do hereby solemnly state and affirm as under:1. That I am the first Respondent in this Contempt Petition and am fully acquainted with the facts of this case. I have read and understood the contents of the Contempt Petition filed by Shri Harish Salve in his capacity as Amicus Curiae and my reply to it is as under:2. From the report in Tehelka, which is relied upon as the basis of the alleged contempt, reliance has been placed on the following sentences: Firstly,“In my view, out of the last 16 to 17 Chief Justices, half have been corrupt. I can’t prove this, though we had evidence against Punchhi, A...
SaafNations is a global alliance of citizens and groups/forums